Atrial Fibrillation Management During Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Societal guidelines support atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment during surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Recently, many patients with AF at low to intermediate risk are managed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Therefore, we evaluated longitudinal outcomes in these populations. METHODS: The United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database was evaluated for all beneficiaries with AF undergoing TAVR or SAVR with/without AF treatment (2018-2020). Treatment of AF included concomitant left atrial appendage obliteration, with/without surgical ablation, or endovascular appendage occlusion and/or catheter ablation at any time. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes defined procedures with doubly robust risk adjustment across each group. RESULTS: A total of 24,902 patients were evaluated (17,453 TAVR; 7,449 SAVR). Of patients undergoing SAVR, 3176 (42.6%) underwent AF treatment (SAVR+AF). Only 656 TAVR patients (4.5%) received AF treatment. Comparing well-balanced SAVR+AF vs SAVR vs TAVR, there were no differences in the in-hospital incidence of renal failure, bleeding, or stroke, but increased pacemaker requirement (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; P < .0001) and vascular injury (OR, 9.09; P < .0001) were noted in TAVR and higher hospital mortality (OR, 4.02; P < .0001) in SAVR+AF. SAVR+AF was associated with lower readmission for stroke compared with SAVR alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; P = .029) and TAVR (HR, 0.68; P < .0001) and with improved survival vs TAVR (HR, 0.79; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF requiring aortic valve replacement, SAVR+AF was associated with improved longitudinal survival and freedom from stroke compared with TAVR. SAVR+AF treatment should be considered first-line therapy for patients with AF requiring aortic valve replacement.

Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Recent approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients at low surgical risk has resulted in a rapid real-world expansion of TAVR in patients not otherwise examined in recent low-risk trials. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus TAVR in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Using the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries undergoing isolated SAVR (n = 33,210) or TAVR (n = 77,885) (2018-2020). International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes were used to define variables and frailty was defined by the validated Kim index. Doubly robust risk adjustment was performed with inverse probability weighting and multilevel regression models, as well as competing-risk time to event analysis. A low-risk cohort was identified to simulate recent low-risk trials. RESULTS: A total of 15,749 low-risk patients (8144 SAVR and 7605 TAVR) were identified. Comparison was performed with doubly robust risk adjustment accounting for all factors. TAVR was associated with lower perioperative stroke (odds ratio, 0.62; P < .001) and hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.16; P < .001) compared with SAVR. However, risk-adjusted longitudinal analysis demonstrated TAVR was associated with higher late risk of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.65; P < .001), readmission for valve reintervention (hazard ratio, 1.88; P < .001), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.54; P < .001) compared with SAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk Medicare beneficiaries younger than age 75 years undergoing isolated AVR, SAVR was associated with higher index morbidity and mortality but improved 3-year risk-adjusted stroke, valve reintervention, and survival compared with TAVR.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with and without mitral stenosis - A national readmission database study.

INTRODUCTION: Mitral valve stenosis (MS) can be concomitantly present in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Some studies have reported up to one-fifth of patients who underwent TAVI also have MS. The relationship between mitral stenosis and TAVI has led to concerns regarding increased adverse cardiac outcomes during and after the procedure. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD 2016-2019) was utilized to identify TAVI patients with MS with ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included predictors of all-cause readmissions, length of stay, and total hospitalization cost. We assessed readmission frequency with a national sample weighed at 30 days following the index TAVI procedure. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were analyzed for in-hospital outcomes using univariate and multivariate logistic regression for study cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 217,147 patients underwent TAVI procedures during the queried time period of the study. Of these patients, 2140 (0.98 %) had MS. The overall 30-day all-cause readmission rate for the study cohort was 12.4 %. TAVI patients with MS had higher rates of 30-day readmissions (15.8 % vs 12.3 %, aOR 1.22, CI: 1.03-1.45, P < 0.01). Additionally, TAVI patients with MS had longer lengths of hospital stay during index admissions (5.7 vs. 4.3 days), along with higher total hospitalization costs ($55,157 vs. $50,239). In contrast, in-hospital mortality during index TAVI admission did not differ significantly between the two groups, although there was a trend toward higher mortality in the MS group (2.1 % vs. 1.5 %). Among the TAVI MS cohort, patients admitted on weekends (aOR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.22, P = 0.01), admitted to non-metropolitan hospitals (aOR: 1.29, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.66, P = 0.04) and presence of co-morbidities such as atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter (aOR: 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.16-1.32, P < 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (aOR: 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.22, P < 0.01), prior stroke (aOR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.14, P < 0.01), chronic kidney disease (CKD) ≥3 (aOR: 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.22, P < 0.01), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (aOR: 1.75, 95 % CI: 1.61-1.90, P < 0.01), and anemia (aOR: 1.23, 95 % CI: 1.18-1.28, P < 0.01) were associated with increased odds of readmission. CONCLUSION: Concomitant MS in patients undergoing TAVI is associated with higher readmission rates and total hospital costs. This can contribute significantly to healthcare-related burdens. Further studies are required to evaluate in-hospital outcomes and predictors of readmission in patients undergoing TAVI with the presence of concomitant MS.

Contemporary National Trends of Mechanical Circulatory Support Among Myocarditis Hospitalizations Before the Pandemic: A National In-patient Database (2005-2019) Study.

According to the Global Burden of Disease Project, the morbidity and mortality of myocarditis continue to be a significant worldwide burden. On October 1, 2015, hospital administrative data started using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes instead of the ICD-9. To our knowledge, nationwide trends of myocarditis have not been studied after this update. The NIS database from 2005-2019 was analyzed using ICD-9 and 10 codes. Our search yielded 141,369 hospitalizations due to myocarditis, with 40.9% females. There were 6627 (4.68%) patients who required mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using left ventricular assisted devices (LVAD), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The use of LVAD and ECMO increased significantly during the study period (p-trend 0.003 and <0.001, respectively), whereas the use of IABP decreased during the same period (p-trend 0.025). Our study demonstrated an overall increase in the use of MCS overall in myocarditis, with increasing utilization of more advanced MCS in the forms of LVAD and ECMO.

Comparison of Sex-Based In-Hospital Procedural Outcomes and Hospital Readmission Frequency After Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder Device Placement: A Propensity Matched National Cohort.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder device has been shown to reduce the chance of recurrent stroke. Per guidelines, stroke is higher in females but procedural efficacy and complications based on sex difference is understudied. The nationwide readmission database (NRD) was used to create sex cohorts using ICD-10 Procedural code for elective PFO occluder device placement performed during the years 2016-2019. The 2 groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression models that matched for confounders to report multivariate odds ratio (mOR) for primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute ischemic stroke, postprocedure bleeding, and cardiac tamponade. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v. 17. A total of 5818 patients who underwent PFO occluder device placement were identified, of which 3144 (54.0%) were females, and 2673 (46.0%) were males. There was no difference in periprocedural in-hospital mortality, new onset acute ischemic stroke, postprocedural bleeding, or cardiac tamponade between both sexes undergoing occluder device placement. AKI incidence was higher in males compared to females after matching for CKD (mOR = 0.66; 95% CI [0.48-0.92]; P = 0.016) this can be procedural or can be secondary to volume status or nephrotoxins. Males also had a higher length of stay (LOS) at their index hospitalization (2 days vs 1 day) which led to slightly higher total hospitalization cost ($26,585 vs $24,265). Our data did not show a statistically significant difference in the readmission LOS trends between the 2 groups at 30, 90, and 180 days. This national retrospective cohort study of PFO occluder outcomes shows similar efficacy and complication rates between sexes, with the exception of AKI incidence which was higher in males. AKI occurrence was high in males that can be limited due to unavailability of data about hydration status and nephrotoxic medications.

Combined Coronary Orbital Atherectomy and Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: The First Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Severely calcified coronary stenoses remain a significant challenge during contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), often requiring advanced therapies to circumvent suboptimal lesion preparation and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Recent reports suggest combined coronary atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) may achieve superior preparation of severely calcified coronary stenoses during PCI. We sought to evaluate the safety and utility of combined orbital atherectomy (OA) and IVL for the modification of coronary artery calcification (CAC) prior to drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in PCI. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent coronary OA and IVL within a single PCI procedure at our institution. The primary outcome was procedural success, defined as successful DES implantation with a residual percent diameter stenosis of <30% and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow following PCI without occurrence of in-hospital MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target-vessel revascularization). MACE was additionally assessed at 30 days post intervention. RESULTS: Eight patients underwent combined coronary OA and IVL within a single PCI procedure. The mean percent diameter stenosis prior to intervention was 80.5 ± 8.3%, with a mean calcific arc of 338 ± 42°. Procedural success was achieved in 7 of 8 cases (87.5%). Both in-hospital and 30-day MACE rates were 0%. CONCLUSION: We report the safe and effective use of combined coronary OA and IVL for the preparation of severely calcified coronary stenoses during PCI. Through their distinct yet complementary mechanisms of action, the combined use of these therapies may achieve superior preparation of severely calcified coronary stenoses during PCI.

The Utility of Peripheral Intravascular Lithotripsy in Calcific Coronary Artery Disease: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is an emerging therapy for the modification of coronary artery calcification (CAC). Data on its use in several clinical and lesion subsets are limited due to their exclusion from preapproval trials. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who were excluded from preapproval trials of coronary IVL and underwent CAC modification with the off-label use of a peripheral IVL system. The primary outcome was a composite of procedural success, defined as residual stenosis <10%, and no major adverse cardiac event (MACE), ie, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target- vessel revascularization, in hospital and at 30 days. RESULTS: Between June 2019 and April 2020, a total of 9 patients who underwent off-label coronary IVL were identified. Exclusion criteria from preapproval trials included a target lesion within an unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA; n = 3) and/or ostial location (n = 5), a target lesion involving in-stent restenosis (n = 3), a second target-vessel lesion with >50% stenosis (n = 1), and/or New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure (n = 5). The primary outcome was achieved in 8 patients. MACE rate was 0% in hospital and at 30 days. For ULMCA lesions (n = 3), residual stenosis was 0% in 2 patients and 10% in 1 patient. For right coronary artery lesions (n = 3), residual stenosis was 0% in 2 patients and 40% in 1 patient. For left anterior descending coronary artery lesions (n = 3), residual stenosis was 0% in all patients. CONCLUSION: Coronary IVL with a peripheral IVL system may be an effective therapy for CAC modification within ULMCA disease, ostial disease, in-stent restenosis, and New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure.

Catheter-based embolectomy prior to right ventricular mechanical circulatory support placement after heart transplantation.

Severe acute isolated right ventricular failure has limited dedicated percutaneous temporary mechanical circulatory support options, especially after orthotopic heart transplantation. The advent of the Impella RP device provides a newer option, though an absolute contraindication to device placement is thrombus within the right heart. We present a novel case where catheter-based embolectomy was used to evacuate right heart thrombus before Impella RP placement in a patient with severe acute right ventricular failure due to primary graft dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation.

Left Atrial Dilation and Risk of One-Year Readmission after Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.

BACKGROUND: Structural left atrial and ventricular abnormalities on the electrocardiogram (ECG) and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) at the time of ischemic stroke have been associated with morbidity and mortality. Yet, the prognostic impact of the same in embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), a relevant subtype of ischemic stroke with a unique pathophysiology, has not been well studied to date. Our aim was to assess the predictive impact of left atrio-ventricular ECG and TTE abnormalities on one-year hospital readmission after ESUS from an ongoing single center prospective stroke registry in the U.S. METHODS: We identified 369 ESUS patients who had at least 1 year of complete follow-up between 2013 and 2018. We examined the association of abnormal left atrio-ventricular findings on ECG and TTE, as well as basic demographic and clinical characteristics, measured at index admission with time to 1-year hospital readmission using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: Recurrent ischemic stroke and cardiovascular causes constituted 60% of all readmissions. Patients with left atrial dilation on TTE were more likely to readmitted within 1 year (HR 1.51; 95% CI, 1.04-2.21). Bundle branch block, pathologic Q-wave, and troponin elevation curves diverged, but were not significantly associated with readmission (log-rank p=0.34, p=0.08, p=0.42, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Following ESUS, left atrial dilation on TTE was associated with 1-year overall hospital readmission, of which cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ischemic events, and heart failure were a notable proportion. Our data support ongoing studies of atrial cardiopathy in ESUS patients.

Abnormal Bolus Reflux Is Associated With Poor Pulmonary Outcome in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is postulated to play a role in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the value of objective GER measures in predicting IPF disease progression is unclear. We aim to evaluate the association between objective GER measures on multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) testing and development of poor pulmonary outcomes within 1 year in prelung transplant IPF patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with IPF who underwent pre-lung transplant evaluation with MII-pH off proton pump inhibitors (PPI) at a tertiary care center from June 2008 to November 2015. Patients were followed for 1 year from time of MII-pH for poor pulmonary outcomes, defined by hospitalization for respiratory exacerbation or death. Univariate, multivariate and time-to-event analyses were performed to assess associations between baseline GER parameters on MII-pH and poor outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-four subjects (mean age 61.1 years, 64.3% male) were included. Subjects with increased bolus exposure time (BET) had a higher incidence of 1-year poor pulmonary outcome vs normal BET (45.7% vs 15.2%, P = 0.006). Increased BET remained an independent predictor of poor outcome after controlling for age, gender, body mass index, smoking, lung disease severity, and PPI use (OR, 4.18; P = 0.030). Increased BET was also predictive of decreased time to poor pulmonary outcome (hazard ratio [HR], 4.88; P = 0.007). Subgroup analyses showed that increased BET remained independently associated with time to pulmonary hospitalization (HR, 4.00; P = 0.020), with a trend for 1-year mortality (HR, 2.19; P = 0.380). CONCLUSION: Increased BET on MII-pH is an independent predictor of poor pulmonary outcome over 1 year in IPF patients.

A national radiation oncology medical student clerkship survey: didactic curricular components increase confidence in clinical competency.

PURPOSE: Students applying to radiation oncology residency programs complete 1 or more radiation oncology clerkships. This study assesses student experiences and perspectives during radiation oncology clerkships. The impact of didactic components and number of clerkship experiences in relation to confidence in clinical competency and preparation to function as a first-year radiation oncology resident are evaluated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous, Internet-based survey was sent via direct e-mail to all applicants to a single radiation oncology residency program during the 2012-2013 academic year. The survey was composed of 3 main sections including questions regarding baseline demographic information and prior radiation oncology experience, rotation experiences, and ideal clerkship curriculum content. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 37% (70 of 188). Respondents reported 191 unique clerkship experiences. Of the respondents, 27% (19 of 70) completed at least 1 clerkship with a didactic component geared towards their level of training. Completing a clerkship with a didactic component was significantly associated with a respondent's confidence to function as a first-year radiation oncology resident (Wilcoxon rank-sum P=.03). However, the total number of clerkships completed did not correlate with confidence to pursue radiation oncology as a specialty (Spearman ρ P=.48) or confidence to function as a first year resident (Spearman ρ P=.43). CONCLUSIONS: Based on responses to this survey, rotating students perceive that the majority of radiation oncology clerkships do not have formal didactic curricula. Survey respondents who completed a clerkship with a didactic curriculum reported feeling more prepared to function as a radiation oncology resident. However, completing an increasing number of clerkships does not appear to improve confidence in the decision to pursue radiation oncology as a career or to function as a radiation oncology resident. These results support further development of structured didactic curricula for the radiation oncology clerkship.

Results of a phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of bone marrow mononuclear stem cell administration in patients following ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Initial clinical trials from Europe have demonstrated that the administration of bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells (BMCs) may improve left ventricular (LV) function in patients following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, results from trials performed in the United States have not yet been presented. METHODS: We developed a phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial to investigate the effects of BMC administration in patients following STEMI on recovery of LV function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). Forty patients with moderate to large anterior STEMIs were randomized to 100 million intracoronary BMCs versus placebo 3 to 10 days following successful primary angioplasty and stenting (percutaneous coronary intervention) of the left anterior descending coronary artery. RESULTS: Administration of BMC was safely performed in a high-risk cohort with minimal major adverse clinical event rates, and all patients remain alive to date. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 49.0% +/- 9.5% at baseline to 55.2% +/- 9.8% at 6 months by cMRI in the BMC group (P < .05), which was not different from the increase in the placebo group (48.6% +/- 8.5% to 57.0% +/- 13.4%, P < .05). Left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased by 4 mL/m(2) in the BMC group at 6 months but increased significantly in the placebo group (17 mL/m(2), P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This phase 1 study from the United States confirms the ongoing safety profile of BMC administration in patients following STEMI. The improvement in LV ejection fraction at 6 months by cMRI in the cell therapy group was not different than the placebo group. However, BMC administration had a favorable effect on LV remodeling at 6 months.